Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:25

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

What exactly is female squirting? Is it only urine or a combination of liquids?

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

There are some books that just…suck!

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

How physicists used antimatter, supercomputers and giant magnets to solve a 20-year-old mystery - The Conversation

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

I'm British and feel ashamed of the crimes of British colonialism. What should I do?

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Why are Democrats opposed to restrictions on contraception such as requiring people to be over 18 to buy contraception, banning mail order contraception, and requiring a prescription from a doctor?

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

PC: The Guardian

Actually have some literary skill:

If nobody will hire me, should I turn to crime to pursue a career in programming? I ask because if there's no legal entry-level jobs due to the oversaturation, I might have to go underground for it.

Many if not most, are in this category.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

Thanks to FIFA, Atlanta’s first-ever Club World Cup game was underwhelming - AJC.com

PC: Google

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

Diablo II: Resurrected Ladder Season 11 Now Live - Blizzard News

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

John Isner now ranks where Carlos Alcaraz's win over Jannik Sinner sits in the best matches ever, 'I'm changing my tune' - The Tennis Gazette

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Why does it smell so bad? I noticed that when I move around my vagina has a stench. It’s usually a wet liquid, almost like pee. There’re little to no discharge and it doesn’t hurt or itch.

Have the ability to visualize:

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Have anyone had an relationship of any kind with a spirit or demon, such as a succubus? If so, how was it?

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

PC: Google…my precious!

What is a good habit and what is bad one?

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

HBO and CNN owner Warner Bros Discovery to split in two - BBC

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

PC: Google

Entertainment.

Bicycling tied to reduced dementia risk and greater hippocampal volume retention - Medical Xpress

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

PC: Google

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

Is it true that Jehovah's witnesses once thought the world would end in 1975?

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

PC: Google

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema: